|
Methodology
The process of developing creative strategies
requires three important tasks- Investigation,
Strategy, and Execution. The key catalyst for success of the entire
process is the ability to find and recognize nuggets-
in needs, trends, discontinuities, opportunities, threats-
and to apply these insights to the firm's strategic focus,
objectives, implementation plans, and organizations.

The Investigation phase focuses on three uncontrollable
issues- customers, competition and business climate.
It also includes evaluation of the firm that stays on
course because of strong currents of objectivity that
flow in this phase. However, during the strategic focus
phase, there is always the inherent danger of institutionalized "bad
habits" resurfacing to destroy, if not to hinder,
development of a new strategic perspective. The process
is internal to the firm at this stage and the role and
participation of the CEO is critical in defining and
supporting the process.
Opportunities are created by the interaction of four
issues: Customers, Competition, (Business) Climate and
Company- the four Cs of the market place. The first three
Cs relate to external factors to the firm while the fourth
C is Company- the client firm. Analysis and synthesis
of information in these four arenas provide insights
into the nature of markets and the firm's responses.
Customer analysis involves understanding the details
of many factors- yielding customer segments, and each
segment's drivers, motivations and needs. To gather insights
about the nature of the customers requires, at the outset,
asking seemingly generic questions such as:
- Who are the customers- both existing customers and
prospects, internal and external to the firm?
- What do they buy?
- How do they buy?
- Why do they buy?
- Where do they buy?
- When do they buy?
Answers to each question typically reveals a first level
of understanding of the nature of customers. However,
delving deeper into the responses usually reveals the
nuggets that are critical for insights into segmentation,
market drivers, needs, trends and discontinuities. For
example, a focus on "who, what, how, why, where,
and when do prospects buy?" usually reveals perspectives
that are not obvious when investigating existing customers.
Competitor analysis is the second phase of the investigation
process. The first issue is defining competitors in the
market space. Myopia can create shortsightedness in defining
the competitive arena, to the detriment of the client,
and must be overcome.
The "who, what, how, why, where, and when" competition
sells, and their revenues, margins, and growth rates,
are the next series that reveal some aspects of each
competitor's market strategies, and the players' competitive
positions.
However, that is not adequate. A competitor's organization,
culture, assets, and skills in innovation, manufacturing,
technology, finance (access to capital), information
technology, management, marketing, and customer base
(to name a few) are also important in determining apparent
strategy and business design.
An additional step is to group competitive firms that
pursue similar strategies, and have similar assets, skills
and other characteristics.
Company analysis is similar to competitor analysis except
that subjectivity creeps in. Competitive analysis is
somewhat objective, done at a distance, but with limited
information. Self-analysis tends to be subjective, with
tendencies to use available information. This is most
often unacceptable.
The challenge is to create an objective framework for
self-evaluation. Typically, the analysis criteria developed
by critically dissecting competition, easily transfers
to the self-analysis phase. Additionally, the hypotheses
created by the team are shared with a diagonal cross-section
of the firm for verification, or modification.
Business Climate issues are those issues that are beyond
the control of customers, competition, and the Client
Company. Economic, Environmental, Regulatory, Cultural,
Technological, Demographic, Political and other factors
have far reaching consequences on the market place.
Therefore monitoring, detecting, and analyzing these
issues are critical to identifying relevant trends and
discontinuities that, in turn, could create opportunities
or threats to the firm. Scenario and impact analyses
of the most relevant business climate issues provide
insights for developing resultant strategies.
Analysis and synthesis of the
four Cs- into major issues,
trends and discontinuities, and opportunities and threats-
typically yield the market landscape for the firm to
achieve its overarching corporate objectives. The firm
then has to define its strategic focus to succeed in
this newly defined terrain.
The strategic focus of the client firm varies depending
on the nature of the business unit. The unit can be a
strategic business unit (SBU) or a strategic product
unit (SPU)- the unit that encounters direct product competition
in the market. The SBU has several SPUs in its repertoire,
each connected to the other by functional synergy of
some nature.
The strategic focus of an SBU and SPU is constructed
on the foundation of opportunities and threats revealed
in the investigation phase. The strategic direction is
then defined by the interaction of the attractiveness
of specific markets and segments, and the relative competitive
strength of the client firm in those markets.
These then get translated into specific business objectives
for the SBU and SPUs of the firm. The SPU's business
objectives become objectives to specific departments
in the customer value delivery chain.
Execution: The most challenging phase for the organization
is the implementation phase. The process now becomes
internally focused, controlled by its organization. The
inertia of the previous strategic direction and practices
is significant- the more significant the departure from
the existing strategic path, the greater the power of
the "Not Invented Here" (NIH) and the "This
is not the way we do things around here!" syndromes.
The biggest hindrance to accelerated growth is the inability
organizations to quickly drop old habits and assume new
ones. Also, it takes time to add new capabilities and
practices to existing organizations. Therefore, a five-step
approach is considered.

The first two steps initiate the implementation
phase and the final three take the firm to their final
goal.
Step 1. Establish a growth oriented leadership team
with:
- Ambition to create a new company
- Willingness to bet their career on it
- Ability to implement the growth strategy
- Ability to develop capabilities required for growth
- Ability to meet both short-term and long-term goals
Step 2. Articulate Vision Quickly
- Create a leadership ambition for growth
- Establish rational, political, and emotional commitment
to growth; set the basis to alter culture
- Build a thorough understanding of opportunities and capabilities
- Focused on implementation and execution
Each of the final three steps- has imbedded
in it, an Ambition-Strategy-Capability cycle. Ambition
is the essence of the step's objective, strategy defines
the methods of achieving it, and capability is the firm's
infrastructure to fulfill its ambition.

The transition and transformation to
the final outcome is a three-step process of getting
started, then getting better, and finally, becoming different.
However, each of these steps, requires an intermediate
goal, strategy, and development of company capabilities
to meet the goals.
Step 3. Get Started
- Find and implement early wins
- Find and fix quick hits
- Involve the organization
- Train and educate the organization
Step 4. Get Better
- Create and encourage profitable market focus
- Create and encourage growth creating processes
- Reengineer processes
- Mobilize organization for growth
Step 5. Create Competitive Edge
- Create broader and deeper understanding of markets,
customers, and their dynamics
- Alliances, Mergers, and Acquisitions
- Develop new capabilities
- Enter new markets
The ultimate goal is to be significantly different,
in important ways, in the market space. The process recognizes
that the path to this end is not instantaneous but a
gradual one with intermediate victories, and building
of capabilities. At the core is the growth team with
its articulated vision.

Top of page
|